The comments I heard when evacuating the hall after watching a simple but well-knitted movie were like "Did he (Rajat kapoor) make an art movie?" , "Second part was not upto the mark.", "I was expecting some twist..but it was too very simple no thrill...he had to die and he died..." etc.
Why do we always expect something unexpected to happen. Just because we want to defy the usualness of our lives. Whenever someone comes with something much akin to our life, we are not ready to expect it wholeheartedly. "Ya good ..but some more could be done...the end could be more thrilling.." I say; It could be but is it required to be that way always. Is someone not allowed to capture the stillness and usualness of our life.
I agree that first part was quite hilarious. Ranveer shorey was doing what he is known for. His effort was well complimented by other co-performers like saurabh Shukla, Vinay pathak etc. But why can we not notice the diversity of the director and ranveer as an actor in the second part. The way rajat kapoor changed the mood of the plot in the second half is praiseworthy and it also allowed the actors to come up with a wholesome performance. But the only thing most of us could notice is "the second half was not thrilling and quite expected."
I enjoyed boh the parts. It is a movie which has everything if something lacks its the abnormality or the supernatuarlity. I think this department is assigned to Farah and karan why everyone should encroach to their fiefdom. Thanks Rajat for extracting such performances from Ranveer, Nasheerudin shah, Saurabh shukla. Its due to directors like you we can watch such actors.
No comments:
Post a Comment